This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mar 21 15:34, Peter Foley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen > <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote: > > I realized that your orignal patch isn't invalidated by this so I tried > > to apply it and we could then add the other stuff later. However, it > > doesn't compile due to a warning, and since we're always building with > > -Werror... > > > > [...]/cxx.cc:33:1: error: âvoid operator delete(void*, size_t)â is a usual (non-placement) deallocation function in C++14 (or with -fsized-deallocation) [-Werror=c++14-compat] > > operator delete (void *p, size_t) > > ^ > > cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors > > > > I'm not sure it's the right thing to switch to C++14 by default using > > gcc 5.3 yet. > > Ah, in that case, a better solution might be to drop this patch and > add an explicit -std= to the Makefile. > In that case, Cygwin won't have any issues when the default changes to > c++14 in gcc 6.0 But using -std= when building Cygwin wouldn't change the fact that we might need this delete anyway for applications built with -std=c++14 or do I miss something? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |