This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Proposed FAQ in DocBook (Attn: tetex maintainer)
- From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna at efn dot org>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:01:34 -0700
- Subject: Re: Proposed FAQ in DocBook (Attn: tetex maintainer)
- References: <cb51e2e050803221558317848@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.61.0508041110060.3695@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> <87vf2l90b6.fsf@peder.flower> <Pine.GSO.4.61.0508041218070.3695@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:36:54PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with dropping support for some part of a
> bundled toolset in a new package release. The only things I'm asking for
> are a) that this be announced, and b) that, if that part of the toolset is
> important, alternative packaging options are discussed on cygwin-apps
> beforehand, rather than having people find out after the fact. If this is
> unreasonable, please let me know.
Only unreasonable if you don't have a time machine :)