This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'wouldn't say goo to a boose'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:54:53 +0100
- Subject: RE: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
----Original Message----
>From: Gary R. Van Sickle
>Sent: 12 September 2005 00:11
> Did you miss this part sir?:
>
> "Please point out an instance of where I have "flamed" you, so that I may
> apologize, and we can both put the terrible tragedy behind us."
>
> If it's "flame", let's put it out. If it ain't, let's stop the false
> accusations, huh?
>
>> Instead, I invite you to privately reread all your messages
>> criticising others and reflect upon them.
>
> No, you're the one doing the accusing, it's your job to do the legwork.
> If indeed there are "all [these] messages criticising others" flowing
> from me,
> it should surely be trivial to find just one example that's a "flame" in
> the archives, should it not?
Hahaaa! Classic old UPA technique: demand proof from someone that you
have flamed them (or someone else), wait for them to go off, dig up and post
a few google groups links to your old material, then the minute they do
start pointing and laughing at them and jumping up and down going "haha I
t0rlled j00 into googlestalking me fanboi!". <nostalgic sigh> It's just
like Usenet circa 1997 all over again.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....