This is the mail archive of the cygwin-talk mailing list for the cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:22:52AM -0400, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:mwoehlke wrote:In fact that is the case, and it is a shame.So... are we just disagreeing over "safe", or are you actually telling me that RH (and thus Cygwin) would *refuse* to incorporate public domain code?
In RH's defense, there is some legal vagueness around public domain code (and a few strange laws that add to the confusion by trying to accommodate shareware and such). But one would think that as a huge proponent of open source development, RH lawyers would have figured it out by now.
What Red Hat lawyers (and I, the IANAL, for that matter) have figured out is that if someone sticks a "Public Domain" tag on a piece of software, you still have to go through due diligence to find out if the software is actually encumbered or not since anyone with a text editor can put anything they like in a file. That would mean getting a release from the person's company.
So, I don't see how public domain buys you much.
Oddly enough the FSF has the same requirements.
The irony of course is that the availability of a commercial license makes it look like Daryl's fears are in fact very well founded. :-)I don't care if they want to make money, but their current policy actually prevents code from being released into the public domain. Even if their real motivation is not monetary, that is a consequence that I'd rather avoid.
Again, Red Hat isn't doing anything different than the FSF.
Red Hat does not have any interest in the "public domain". Where Cygwin is concerned, they need to be absolutely certain that they either own the code or that the code's license is conformant with their needs.
-- Matthew vIMprove your life! Now on version 7!
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |