This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Preremove/postinstall scripts fail with snapshot installed
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:31:34 +0100
- Subject: Re: Preremove/postinstall scripts fail with snapshot installed
- References: <4D56A002.2090707@cornell.edu> <4D56A7D5.6010104@cornell.edu> <20110212164415.GB3264@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110212181224.GC3264@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110213162449.GA20855@calimero.vinschen.de> <4D5812DD.8030600@cornell.edu> <4D58643A.4040400@cornell.edu> <20110214092054.GB14998@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110214164128.GA29654@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110214203134.GA20507@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Feb 14 15:31, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:41:28PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 14 10:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb 13 18:07, Ken Brown wrote:
> >> > On 2/13/2011 12:20 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >> > $1 ls
> >> > 0 [main] bash 2220 exception::handle: Exception:
> >> > STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
> >>
> >> Yes, I encountered that at one point yesterday as well, and I have
> >> already a patch in the pipe, but didn't apply it so far because I
> >> want to do some tests first.
> >> [...]
> >> Anyway, I'll apply a patch later today.
> >
> >Nope, not today. I stumbled over some other problems which require
> >more debugging.
>
> FYI, I suspect the problem is still there since you haven't fixed it yet.
I was going to write a funny reply but for some reason I just had no
idea for a funny reply. So I'm writing these lines to inform you that I
won't funnily reply to your mail with a funny reply because my funny reply
service is temporarily out of service.
Sorry for any inconvenince,
Corinna