This is the mail archive of the cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Cygwin participation threshold
- To: "DJ Delorie" <dj@delorie.com>
- Subject: Re: Cygwin participation threshold
- From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:13:45 -0500
- Cc: "cygwin" <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
- Delivered-To: listarch-cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
- Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
- Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
>
>> Their product does not depend on Cygwin, but it does provide
>> switches to use Cygwin headers and libraries for porting purposes.
>> The fact is they got a commercial F77 and F90 which can use Cygwin
>> headers and libraries, makes it a really attractive product.
>
>In that case, it still acts to mkae cygwin more popular, which
>hopefully means that more people will use it in general, etc.
>
Absolutely true. I guess PGi is the only product right now which offers
a
Cygwin compability, with F77/F90 and HPF for single and multiprocessors
machines.
That was the reason i decided to go for it. To be honest G77 still lags
behind a normal F77 compiler.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com