This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: port of omniorb

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karsten Fleischer []
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:41 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: port of omniorb
> > X - done, bug reports accepted
> > C - can't be done, or very hard to do.  Should be critical 
> regardless -
> > consider patching the source to not need this.
> > O - coded, but possibly not available in cygwin snapshots.
> Robert,
> I will have a closer look at the OmniORB sources. Could be 
> that some calls
> are #ifdef'ed and not needed for Cygwin.
> If OmniORB could be compiled with the existing Cygwin 
> pthreads I'd try to
> compile our application on Cygwin, which would be a good 
> regression test for
> the whole Cygwin package (11000 source files, C, C++, 
> Xm etc.)
> Karsten

Thank you. 
More importantly, if you could see what calls are actually _required_
and what calls are _preferred_.

I.E. the setpri0 calls are almost certainly not _needed_ as they related
to priority, not to data storage. useing these calls as an example, they
may not be #ifdef'ed today, but if you #ifdef them omniORB should still

If you can do this it will let me focus on whats required.


Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]