This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: RE: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:27:14 +1000
- Thread-Index: AcDCEtDSo5aKmhuuRZusU+D5YqEs8gAAsylQ
- Thread-Topic: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:02 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW:
> pthread_create problem
> in Cygwin 1.1.8-2]
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:10AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> This is one of those situations where it looks like gcc can't be
> >> released until a version of cygwin is released with the requisite
> >> functionality.
> >What's missing? I have a list of over 20 functions in front
> of me that
> >I've just coded stubs for...
> What I was referring to is that if we release a version of
> gcc which relies
> on functions available only in cygwin snapshots that's
> clearly a problem.
> I don't know specifically what pthread functionality gcc
> uses, however.
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that you had to hold of
releasing gcc 2.95.3 at all until cygwin had enough pthread support to
build gcc with threads enabled.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple