This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: RE:Q about unistd.h/getopt.h
- To: "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf dot Habacker at saght dot tessag dot com>,<cygwin at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: RE:Q about unistd.h/getopt.h
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:47:52 +1000
- References: <000d01c0c722$387dadf0$6e032bb7@BRAMSCHE>
include <getopt.h> in the appropriate files for KDE.
THIS IS THE WRONG LIST FOR KDE.
Use firstname.lastname@example.org for X-Windows related questions, including
ports of X-windows apps.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf.Habacker@saght.tessag.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: RE:Q about unistd.h/getopt.h
> Hi, Mark Paulus wrote:
> >I apologize if this has been asked, but I can't seem to access the
> >archives right now to check. Anyway, I am building fetchmail,
> >and it mostly builds right out of the box, except for one small
> >which I noticed before but didn't pay attention to much.
> >It complains that fetchmail.c has an undefined variable
> >optind. After looking around, and compiling the exact
> >same source on my debian box, I find out that getopt.h
> <is included in unistd.h, with the following code:
> >#ifdef __USE_POSIX2
> >/* Get definitions and prototypes for functions to process the
> > arguments in ARGV (ARGC of them, minus the program name) for
> > options given in OPTS. */
> ># define __need_getopt
> ># include <getopt.h>
> >and that nothing like this exists in cygwin.
> >My debian machine is using 2.95.2-13 of gcc. Is this a difference
> >in the versions of gcc, or an issue with the cygwin version of
> For KDE I need the same function. Should getopt.h included in unistd.h
> future cygwin releases ?
> Who can give an answer
> Ralf Habacker
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple