This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ntsec and sshd question
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
- From: "Karl M" <karlm30 at hotmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:47:00 -0700
But I did not see it before I set 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty'. When I had no value
set for the CYGWIN variable, I did not see the extra sshd process. Why is it
>From: Corinna Vinschen <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:37:48 +0200
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> > Hi All...
> > I just turned on 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' and set up my file protections to
> > sshd happy (running as a srvany service on win2k sp1).
> > myname@MACHINENAME ~
> > $ ps -aef
> > UID PID PPID TTY STIME COMMAND
> > system 652 1 0 15:39:34 /usr/sbin/sshd
> > system 800 1 -1 15:39:39 /usr/sbin/sshd
> > myname 1272 1 1 15:41:23 /usr/bin/bash
> > myname 1104 1272 1 15:41:30 /usr/bin/ps
> > When I rebooted my machine and did a ps, I saw an extra sshd process
> > did not see before. ssh/sshd appear to work fine. Why is there an extra
> > process...is it normal...does anyone else have the same thing happen?
>It's normal. It's the parent sshd which has been started by
>SRVANY and which has forked the daemon. It's not needed
>anymore but for some reason SRVANY blocks that the process
>can exit. if you stop the service (`net stop sshd') you
>will see that SRVANY and the first sshd process have exited
>but the daemon itself remains and is fully funtional.
>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Developer mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
>Red Hat, Inc.
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple