This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: tar and symlinks
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:51:39PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>> >I just noticed something with my recent ncurses-5.2-5 update. When I
>> >did the "make install prefix=/tmp/usr" step, /tmp/usr/man/man3/*
>> >contained a lot of symbolic links. Since I did this under cygwin-1.3.1
>> >without the "useoldsymlinks" switch (whatever it is), these symbolic
>> >links were the "new" kind; Windows understood them.
>> >However, after I created the tarball & ran setup on it to actually
>> >install the new ncurses on my system prior to uploading it, I discoved
>> >that the symlinks in /usr/man/man3 thus created were OLD style.
>> setup.exe only understands how to create old-style symlinks currently.
>> I think that this is a good thing until cygwin 1.3.1 is more widely
>> So, maybe in three months or so we'll upgrade setup.exe to use the new
>> style but, for now, I think it is doing the right thing.
>Sounds ok to me. BUT, tar.exe all by itself behaves the same way. Is
>that *also* the "right thing"? I'm not sure.
Hmm. I should have checked out what you were saying a little more to
avoid another round of email.
My version of tar creates the new style symlinks. I just extracted the
cygwin-1.3.1.-1.tar.gz file into a dummy directory. The symlink files
in the lib directory were 'libm.a.lnk', 'libc.a.lnk', etc. I verified
this with the 'dir' command.
Setting CYGWIN=nowinsymlinks caused tar to create old-style symlinks.
I don't know why you are seeing different behavior. AFAIK, tar uses the
symlink call to create symbolic links so I don't see why it would behave
any differently from 'ln -s'.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple