This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?
- To: "Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" <lhall at rfk dot com>
- Subject: Re: Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?
- From: "Andreas Eibach" <a dot eibach at gmx dot net>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 19:51:13 +0200
- Cc: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- References: <4.3.1.2.20010501130800.0165e0b8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
To: "Andreas Eibach" <a.eibach@gmx.net>; <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Questionable inclusion of ghostscript in setup.exe?
> At 01:05 PM 5/1/2001, Andreas Eibach wrote:
> >I suggest to either include a _non-X_ version or omit it because "the way
it
> >comes", it's unusable for people who don't have X.
> >
> >Andreas
>
>
>
> I believe this issue has been discussed.
You are right, Larry, and I know it has been discussed. But I couldn't make
out any agreement towards a definite direction from these thread(s) yet, so
I chose to keep this topic from being forgotten.
> I believe the direction is to include a non-X version.
I hope they will.
Andreas
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple