Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0

[Corinna Vinschen <cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:03:17AM -0400, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right
> to complain when replies don't get sent to the list.

Nope! Ever heard about the SENDER'S responsibility to ensure that
a mail will be send to the right address?

Did you actually read the text under the below mentioned URL?

Corinna

> 
> 
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > 
> > Wow! Synchronicity.
> > 
> > This just came up on the Macintosh Java Developers' list today.
> > 
> > Please read this, if you think the Reply-To business is a good idea ('cause
> > it ain't):
> >          <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>.
> > 
> > Randall Schulz
> > Mountain View, CA USA
> > 
> > At 15:12 2001-07-16, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> > >Isn't there a way to get the CygWin mail lists to include the "Reply To"
> > >field, so that this would automatically be done with most email apps?

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/