This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Help on posix file lock semantics
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 01:31:39AM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> At 22.08.01 00:37 , you wrote:
> >Those 2 regions follow each other. I think you're not supposed
> >to merge those regions even if you could.
> >If you don't merge regions in any other case, why would you
> >suddenly want to merge them in the case of overlapping regions?
> But if the (linux) os kernel does it automagically for us, I want to do it too:-)
The comment for posix_lock_file() in fs/locks.s says:
"We merge adjacent locks whenever possible.", so I guess it
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html