This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: recv() blocking for non-blocking socket


Alright, thanks alot. Is there a temporary work-around?

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:38:40AM -0400, Omid Roshan-Afshar wrote:
> > I've looked through the archive, and I found
> > some discussion about using accept() on non-blocking
> > sockets, but none on recv(). If someone could spot
> > any stupid errors in the following code, that would
> > be great.
> > 
> >   {
> >     int true = 1;
> >     if (ioctl(sock_handle, FIONBIO, &true) != 0) {
> >       if (errmsg!=NULL)
> >         sprintf(errmsg, "ioctl(): %s", strerror(errno));
> >       return GFAPI_ERR_FAIL;
> >     }
> >   }
> > 
> > I call recv after I do this and it blocks. I *think* I'm
> > doing the appropriate thing to make the socket non-blocking.
> 
> Actually that's a bug in Cygwin 1.3.2. It should be solved
> with the upcoming 1.3.3 version.
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]