This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: rebase for setup (curl)
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 09:42:57AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Tishler" <email@example.com>
> > I decided to table the search for the "offending" ld option(s) because
> > of the following gloomy thought:
> > Given that rebase can break certain DLLs and that it is nearly
> > impossible to control how arbitrary packages create their DLLs,
> > can setup.exe's proposed rebase solution deal with this problem?
> > Or, is the rebase solution doomed to failure?
> Time for a 2c opinion.
> Looks like something is broken with dllwrap->ld interaction. Does
> adding --shared fix this? Or perhaps the -Wl,--dll should be replaced
> with --shared...
False alarm or the boy who cried wolf...
I just built pq.dll and cygcurl-2.dll using their standard makefiles
and they were rebase-able. This explains why my gcc -shared experiment
"worked" last week.
However, the pq.dll (and other PostgreSQL 7.1.3 DLLs) that I built over
the summer with an older (i.e., previous?) version of gcc/binutils is
So, with the latest tools there does *not* seem to be a problem.
Kevin, what version of gcc/binutils are you using? Are they the latest?
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html