This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Binutil compatibulity
- From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: Sava Zxivanovich <sava dot zxivanovich at crsltd dot com>
- Cc: "'cygwin at cygwin dot com'" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:45:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: Binutil compatibulity
- References: <ECA4D0861693D511A64E00105A46E082030164@superman.crsltd.com>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:34:56PM -0000, Sava Zxivanovich wrote:
> I am working with PowerPC 401 D2 - in deed PLX IOP480.
> I have installed GCC chain that uses binutil 2.9.1, gcc 2.95.2 for
> Due to fact that as in that version do not support one operand - tlbwe,
> I have to upgrade to one I hope does support - 2.10.1. I would not like
> to use 2.11, I had quit a bad time with it (and GCC 3.0.1).
> My question is if binutil 2.10 does support operand tlwbe (PowerPC
> Embedded Environment, PowerPC 401D2), would there be any problem if I
> configure binutils as ppc-eabi (I suppose yes, I would like just to
> check that) and would it be any problem with gcc 2.95.2 (I suppose not,
> but you never know).
> Why am I asking all this? Well, we are very near to a point where we
> would go with commercial compiler. Actually, this is a last cry before
Wrong mailing list.
You should try firstname.lastname@example.org
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:email@example.com
Red Hat, Inc.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html