This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: usr/include/ndbm.h duplicate in cygwin-1.3.11-2
- From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb at nyckelpiga dot de>
- To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:57:39 +0200
- Subject: Re: usr/include/ndbm.h duplicate in cygwin-1.3.11-2
- Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
- References: <72270677363.20020623235302@familiehaase.de><3D1681A1.9080304@ece.gatech.edu>
- Reply-to: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb at nyckelpiga dot de>
Charles schrieb:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Hallo cygwin,
>>
>> cygwin/cygwin-1.3.11-2 The UNIX emulation engine:
>> Sat Jun 22 02:59:41 2002 2879 usr/include/ndbm.h
>>
>> gdbm/gdbm-1.8.0-4 GNU dbm database routines (runtime version):
>> Wed Feb 20 03:05:51 2002 2003 usr/include/ndbm.h
>>
>> Both packages contain the header ndbm.h.
> On June 20, db(3) was added to newlib. Thus, newlib now ships db.h and
> ndbm.h.
> db.h will conflict with the new berkeley db package symlink, and ndbm.h
> as you point out conflicts with gdbm.
> However, since cygwin doesn't yet *export* the database functions, we
> can hide this problem in the short term by:
> 1) cygwin package shouldn't ship db.h or ndbm.h yet
> 2) leave the db() symbols out of cygwin.din
> That will give us some breathing room until 1.3.12. Ummm...chris? I
> just saw the new announcement for 1.3.11-3 -- I think you removed ndbm.h
> but db.h is still there... :-(
Ach so, db.h too, I didn't realized this. Maybe that is the reason why
I cannot build Perl anymore with cygwin-1.3.11-2.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/