This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: strtof is missing
Can you clarify. Do you want me to duplicate the routine or
stick with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
the routine and leave a #define that maps the old name to the
-- Jeff J.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:22PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 20:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Removing the symbol might break these applications (though I assume
there aren't that much apps using strtodf).
We can just export it twice from cygwin.din. That + Jeff's patch will
keep backwards compatability and provide the right API for new apps.
Yes, I think this is the best approach.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html