Re: [PATCH] exclude runtime-pseudo-reloc symbols from auto-export

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 06:48:09PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice
>> (tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that
>> we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table.
>
>I recall commenting on this aspect in a recent binutils thread in the
>cygwin lists, and being told that it didn't matter.
>
>Ha!

Didn't you suggest that anything in a library residing in /usr/lib or
/usr/local/lib be excluded?  That's not quite the same thing as what
I was musing about.  I was talking about marking individual symbols.

Symbols can be global or static.  On elf-supporting symbols global
symbols can also be marked "weak".  On windows they could be marked
"no-export".

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/