This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: rpm-4.1 successful compile on Cygwin


Max Bowsher wrote:

I'm not quite sure rpm really is desirable for the Cygwin dist, unless it
was decided to transition to rpm packages exclusively once setup was
suitably adapted.

Well, there are grand designs eventually to generalize setup so that it can accept tar.bz2 (or .cyg?) packages, as well as linking to (a windows native version of...) librpm and libdeb to provide rpm and deb support. There are, of course, MAJOR difficulties with this, which have yet to be addressed (like keeping the setup installed.db, rpm's db, and deb's "db" all in sync. Bringing setup's native dependency-resolution logic up to the level provided by deb and to a lesser extent rpm. Commandline/scripting support. etc etc)


But, rpm has been around for years on cygwin without the sky falling. I used it back when I provided perl-for-cygwin, as a means of keeping track of binary dists of perl modules. I'm sure there are other, similiarly limited uses that won't cause armageddon.

Besides, dpkg is available as an approved cygwin package, and it hasn't caused WWIII. (Of course, it also hasn't prompted the porting of the rest of the debian toolset, much to Robert's chagrin).

It's mainly a toy for me, to learn about rpm, whilst not having to reboot
into Linux.

fair enough.


--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]