This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
- From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: andrew brian clegg <a dot clegg at mail dot cryst dot bbk dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:29:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Yes. "Ed". Nobody fights over it -- everybody hates it.
Igor
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, andrew brian clegg wrote:
> Are there any editors available as binary distributions compiled with the
> -mno-holywars switch?
> ;-)
>
> Andrew.
>
> On Thu, 1 May 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 01:08:10 +1000
> > From: Gareth Pearce <tilps@hotmail.com>
> > To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> > Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
> >
> > > (*) Personally, I think perl support in vim would be nice, but I'm
> > > absolutely against adding a perl dependence to the vim package. There's
> > > no reason to drag in yet another 6.5M of stuff if all I want is an editor.
> > > If that were desirable, I'd just install emacs.
> >
> > if 'all i want is an editor' then why get vim at all.
> > ;)
> >
> > Gareth - no bias here, move along, nothing to see.
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/