This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Wanted X, got Perl - operator error or prequisiste
- From: "Matthew O. Persico" <persicom at acedsl dot com>
- To: <huntharo at msu dot edu>, <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
- Cc: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:12:46 -0400
- Subject: Re: Wanted X, got Perl - operator error or prequisiste
On Fri, 09 May 2003 00:50:52 -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>You did almost enough research.
>You are correct that none of the XFree86 packages depends directory
>or indirectly upon Perl. The little bit of extra research that I
>did for you (other than looking at my setup.hint files again) was to
>run a clean instance of setup.exe (after renaming c:\cygiwn to
>c:\cygwin_foo), select all of the XFree86 packages, then note that
>perl has still not been selected. Thus, no XFree86 packages causes
>perl to be selected.
>Here is what happened (even if you don't remember it):
>1) You saw package foo (say, autoconf)
>2) You thought, ``I might like to have foo''
>3) You selected foo, which depends upon perl and caused perl to be
>4) You thought, ``Nah, I will never use foo''
>5) You unselected foo, which left all of its dependencies (including
>6) You got perl ;)
When I selected the XFree stuff, I started setup.exe and it was in category mode. The only category I picked/expanded was XFree. So, at least in
this session, I did not select any other packages except for what was under XFree. If I had selected them in any other session, I would have had
Perl downloaded in that session. Selections that are not installed are not stored between invocations ( I just proved that).
So there is either a bug in the program or a bug in my head. If I had to make a bet, I'd bet on the bug being in my head, in spite of my protests to
the contrary above. :-)
>Step 5 is crucial there: setup.exe does not unselect dependencies
>when you remove an item from the list of packages to install. Think
>about it, how would we track whether a user selected the package or
>if it was selected by dependency?
With great difficulty.
>Why spend the extra effort
>tracking such things when this is the first time I have seen someone
>ask about this in the 2 or 3 years that I have been working with
>You are correct that XFree86 does not depend upon Perl... you just
>The *.pl scripts in XFree86 mean nothing --- they are not needed for
>the normal operation of the X Server.
Then I'll just whack 'em.
>I hope that clears things up,
Matthew O. Persico
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html