This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin Net - Compilation
- From: DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <aj9035 at wayne dot edu>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:37:59 -0400
- Subject: Re: Cygwin Net - Compilation
I did a umount -A, and I ran bash again. Now I'm not
able to execute anything, including mount.
What do I do ?
---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:00:41 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Igor Pechtchanski <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: Cygwin Net - Compilation
>To: DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <email@example.com>
>See <http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#SEC54>. You may also be
able to run
>the old toolset by setting your cygdrive prefix to "//" (the
>"mount -u -c //", won't work, but you can circumvent it by
>"mount -u -c '/\'") -- *NOTE that this will make you unable
to access any
>network share from that user account!*
>P.S. Try passing the -specs=FILE option to umsgcc -- that
should make it
>read the specs from FILE, unless they *really* diverged from
>On Tue, 13 May 2003, DEEPA SIVASANKARANE wrote:
>> Thanx, Igor. Shall work on getting the new toolset, with
>> configure options changed.
>> Unfortunately, umsgcc does'nt read from a "specs" file
>> like gcc, but uses "built-in specs".
>> BTW, the new syntax for drives is just /c or /cygdrive/c ?
>> Thanx again,
>> best regards,
>> ---- Original message ----
>> >Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 16:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
>> >From: Igor Pechtchanski <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> >Subject: Re: Cygwin Net - Compilation
>> >To: DEEPA SIVASANKARANE <email@example.com>
>> >Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> >On Mon, 12 May 2003, DEEPA SIVASANKARANE wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >> I'm using a certain arch. specific gcc (umsgcc) for
>> >> compilation, whose specs are as below. It looks like
>> >> "umsgcc" was compiled in a Redhat Cygwin environment ?
>> >> This is the one available to me and when I try to
>> >> use it on Cygwin Net release, there were some "file
>> >> not found" errors, tho the files were there and I had
>> >> used "-I" option to include the directory.
>> >> Could anybody pls. help or suggest something ?
>> >> Thanx in advance,
>> >> best regards,
>> >> Deepa
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Using builtin specs.
>> >> Configured
with: //d/sanjiv/proj/tools/redhat/configure --host=i686-pc-
cygwin --target=cra8500-elf --prefix=//f/redhat/cradle --exec-
>> >> UMSGCC version 3.2.042 (with gcc version 2.97-cradle-
>> >The configure options above use the old syntax for
different drives. The
>> >newer Cygwin DLLs (starting from 1.3.1, I think)
interpret the above as,
>> >for example, the share "redhat" on server "f" (which you
most likely don't
>> >have, thus the errors). It probably takes quite a bit of
>> >I'm not sure what you mean by "this is the only one
available" -- Cygwin
>> >has a "gcc" package... Unless you mean "available for
>> >One way to fix this is to recompile the toolchain by
providing the correct
>> >options to configure. Another is to provide your own
specs file (which is
>> >not mentioned above, BTW, use -dumpspecs for that). See
the gcc info page
>> >for the format of the specs file.
>> > Igor
> |\ _,,,---,,_ email@example.com
>ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
> |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
> '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.
>Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of
> -- Leto II
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html