This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: SEGV in conv_path_list_buf_size with xemacs-21.5-b13 and cygwin-1.3.22-1


On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:25:56PM -0500, Pete McCann wrote:
>int __stdcall stat_worker (const char *name, struct __stat64 *buf, int nofollow,
>                           path_conv *pc = NULL) __attribute__ ((regparm (3)));
>
>So, nofollow and pc should have both been 0 coming in (although I see
>pc getting reset to &real_path).  Is this a case of stack corruption
>somewhere?

Maybe.  Do you see the same thing with non-failing cases, though.

>Some bad interaction with the regparm() attribute?

Unlikely.

>Could the debugger be getting confused?

Very likely.  Are you building cygwin with just '-g' and not with '-O2 -g'?
Adding optimization can certainly cause confusion.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]