This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: non network install
- From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb at ukf dot net>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>,"B Thomas" <thomas dot 1037 at osu dot edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:51:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: non network install
- References: <20030611021417.GA473@mathematicallinux.org>
B Thomas wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <3EE65B12.firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Thank you very much for all your replies. Having the distribution in
> folder below the top one does indeed solve the problem.
> I wrote a bunch of tiny bash scripts to make the check dependencies and
> make the iso image for two CD's. I shall put up the scripts and detailed
> instructions on my web page this weekend. I will be gladly help in
> making the patch to the users manual too. I am familiar with TeX, LaTeX
> and HTML but not Texinfo. I shall try learning it , but that will take
> me time. If there is a posibility for converting LateX/Tex with Texinfo
> that would be great. However I would like to develop the scripts into
> a simple but effective program for making the images first.
> Here are some of my concerns with writing a program for making CD
> images, please do make suggetions as appropriate . Right now the way I
> have it set is that the entire distribution fits onto 2 CD's , except
> 1997 and 1998 mail-archives. I have tried to make these CD's so that
> all packages on CD 1 do not depend on any package on CD 2 . However
> packages in CD 2 may depend on CD 1. I did this as I was not sure how
> setup.exe would behave if it found unmet dependencies. I guess I could
> have deleted the older versions and unnecessary things like
> mail-archives so that it all fit on one CD. However personally I was
> disinclined to do this as I don't see why we must have such a
> restriction that the CD ROM distribution has to be one CD. Moreover
> Cywin is bound to grow. Also having older version may be a good idea
> since if there is a bug in a later version that is unacceptable to the
> user he may choose an older one.
That is true, but it is far easier to install from a single CD.
Cygwin does currently fit on a single CD.
Michael Chase's clean_setup.pl
(http://home.ix.netcom.com/~mchase/zip/) may help here:
It can parse setup.ini and produce a list of urls to download, or move files
around, subject to certain filters, including "not previous".
> The way I am doing the dependency checking right now is not very
> satisfactory and would appreciate suggestions . I greped through
> the setup.hints files in each package directory , picked out the
> "requires" lines , appropriately edited it using sed , makeing a table
> which I saved in a file. I also have another file that is a table with
> two columns - one the package name (directory) and the other the CD to
> which it belong. A script then uses these two files to check
> dependencies of CD 1 are fullfilled within it .
> I am acutely aware that this is not the way to go so would like to build
> a portable and robust script that would able to do all of the above
> using just the ftp archive . I would like to be insensitive to changes
> in the ftp archive and be portable to atleast windows and linux .
> I am familiar with C, C++, Java , BASH , Fortran and would be willing
> tor try another language if appropriate. What do you think ?
> Also both dpkg, and rpm have very powerfull dependency checking engines
> so this seems like reinventing the wheel. Alternatively is it better to
> hack the setup.exe code to do all this. I haven't read the code so am
> not very sure if it is portable .
No, setup.exe isn't portable. However, if you want to try and make it so, go
ahead :-) .
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html