This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: About the 'su' command
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> That's the reason behind the cygdaemon effort. So "somebody" is doing
In-fact, I'm working on this ATM. And, it's coming along nicely, thank you very
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 Brian.Kelly@empireblue.com wrote:
> > >> Why rewrite 'su' to do those types of tricks, when 'ssh' already exists?
> > Uhhh - how about "script portability??"
> > (Which is why I predict su will "someday" be made to do this. When??
> > Simple,
> > When somebody does it .... ) [ I ain't demand'in nothin from nobody ]
> > Brian Kelly
> > "Karsten M. Self" <firstname.lastname@example.org>@cygwin.com on 06/29/2003 07:34:57 PM
> > Sent by: email@example.com
> > To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
> > Subject: Re: About the 'su' command
> > Is this, or could this be made, part of the standard Cygwin docs and/or
> > FAQ?
> > Very nice explanation, Bill.
> > Peace.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html