Re: Forks/spawn test using ~latest~ CVS source 20031217 10:00AM (GMT+1)

[Philippe Torche <philippe dot torche at jle dot ch>]

Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:09:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:04:02AM +0100, Philippe Torche wrote:
> >
> > > I've tested the CVS source 20031217 10:00AM (GMT+1) to see if fork/spawn 
> > > works on Multi CPU (4 Xeon) with Windows 2003 Server (see old message 
> > > about it in the mailing list). Unfortunatly It doesn't !
> > >
> > > Below a test script, use it by running run_t.sh. After some time (< 1 
> > > minute) one or more of the 5 sub-shell stop. This batch works perfectly 
> > > using a single P4 cpu on Windows XP !
> >
> > I don't know how many people out there have Multi CPU Xeons, but I
> > suspect there aren't many.  This works fine in my single CPU system,
> > as you note.
> >
> >
> > > Thanks in advance, Philippe.
> > >
> > > PS 1 : 4-5th attempt to send a mail to cygwin@cygwin.com using three 
> > > different mail account, gmane newgroup ! Anti-spam ? :(
> >
> > Yes.  ZIP file attachments.
> >
> >
> > > PS 2 : Vital for me that this works before end of the month !
> >
> > Sorry, but why would your urgency have any bearing on a community,
> > volunteer project?
>
>
> Maybe he's implying there is funding available for working on this if
> necessary?
Yes, I can (C, C++ is in my knowledge, debug, strace, ...).

Thanks a lot, Philippe.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/