This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fortune maintainer wanted and question for Corinna (was Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.)

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Jan  7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead:
> >
> >
> >
> > which generate 5 packages: fortune-mod (the binaries),
> > fortunes-min, fortunes, fortunes-off, and fortunes-bofh-excuses.
> >
> > If these look ok to me, do you see any problem with using them instead?
> > (There are also a lot of non-English data files packages that I'm not
> > going to mess with at the moment.)
> Personally I'd rather see only one fortune package.  Using the -o
> plus rot13 technique should really do it.

I'm with Corinna here.  Fortune does not warrant 5 packages, or even 3.
One package is sufficient.  ROT13 and mark the limericks with -o and move
on.  Deviating from an already established convention for packaging a
given program is just asking for trouble, and you're artificially making
more work than is necessary.  K.I.S.S. !!

> Corinna

Peter A. Castro <> or <>
	"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood

Unsubscribe info:
Problem reports:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]