This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
- From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew at DeFaria dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:25:31 -0800
- Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
- References: <email@example.com> <E1CnubM-0007BWfirstname.lastname@example.org>
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Oh for the love of me, DeFaria:
Actually I don't love you at all.
You snipped the good stuff. So are you a lawyer or a potty mouthed
junior high-school sys admin? We are dying to know!
Please do not try to express a false legal opinion to justify a
faulty personal one.
I am expressing no legal opinion. I am merely stating the obvious:
if there's no potty-mouth there to offend, nobody can be offended by
the potty-mouth. Do you disagree with this axiom?
We have not established that either. Again it is your assertion.
Ok, I'll chalk this one up to you not having completed any mathematics
classes requiring you to do proofs yet (I think they start once you
get to high school, so consider this a learning experience):
I've completed more math classes than you'll ever know.
An axiom is a basic statement of fact assumed to be true because of
its obviousness. It is obviously true that if A does not exist, nobody
could be offended by A. For any and all definitions of A.
Now, Mr. DeFaria, do you or do you not agree with that axiom?
What they hell are you talking about?!? You need to take some basic
logic courses! You say that this stuff is "potty-mouthed" (whatever
that's supposed to mean you have not defined). That sir is just your
OPINION! It is not fact nor is it obvious nor is it "A". And above you
say that your OPINION is obvious therefore you are right. You are not
right sir, it is just your opinion and you know what they say opinions
are like assholes, everybody's got 'em, and yours is particularly
stinky. It is not obvious sir as many people here disagree with many of
the opinions that you are attempting to hold out as axioms. You sir say
they are potty mouthed (an obvious scientific term) while I could say
they are simply adult humor. Your characterization is no more true than
Anytime four New Yorkers get into a cab together without arguing, a bank
robbery has just taken place.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html