This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: perl Bundle::Cygwin / perl-bundle-cygwin package
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> To further explain, suppose we had a package of all the DateTime::
> modules (which are broken up into many distributions, but I hope you
> would agree would belong together). They have a number of small
> general purpose dependencies; putting those in the same package
> doesn't make sense to me, nor does packaging each individually.
If they have their own CPAN Bundles, then I suppose it would makes sense
to use those in some cases (NOT, for example, Bundle::Gnome2, for the
reasons I stated before). But if they are just simple, non-essential
CPAN modules and aren't (potential) prereq's for something else, then I
don't see a reason to package them at all.
I think that we need to consider the precedents set by other distros.
For example, Gentoo policy is not to make ebuilds for simple CPAN
modules that are non-essential and not required for another package.
There are some CPAN modules (libwww-perl comes to mind) which IIRC I
have seen as part of Fedora, Debian, and Gentoo, so that should be a
> I would lump them all together, along with the few modules we don't
> have packaged yet but that come bundled with ActivePerl (for
> competitive purposes :) and maybe some of the modules that will be
> bundled with perl in 5.10.
Could you provide a list of what you have in mind? That would give me a
better idea of what we're talking about.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html