This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Lev Bishop wrote: > Also, why do you have it so that -s is not just a synonym for -d, and > why doesn't -l force -w? There seems to be no advantage to forcing the > user to specify an additional flag.
...as I previously noted, '-us' is a reasonable combination of flags, thus '-ul' is also reasonable. I did suggest that '-l' should /imply/ '-w' unless '-u' is used.
Well, currently it treats -us or -ul or plain -l or plain -s all as errors and gives the usage message.
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |