RE: [Attention: opengl^H^H^H^H^H w32api,libGLdevel maintainer] Incorrect GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT in glext.h

["Thrall, Bryan" <bryan dot thrall at flightsafety dot com>]

André Bleau wrote on Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:51 AM:
> Bryan Thrall wrote:
>> The opengl 1.1.0-10 package has incorrect values for GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT and
>> GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT: 
>> 
>> #define GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT                   0x86AE
>> #define GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT                  0x86AF
>> 
>> According to
>> http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/EXT/texture_env_dot3.txt, they should
>> be: 
>> 
>> GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT                                    0x8740
>> GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT                                   0x8741>
>> 
>> I thought I'd report this here, since it doesn't seem like the canonical
>> source (according to /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/opengl-1.1.0-10.README,
>> http://www.xmission.com/~nate/glut.html) of the package hasn't been
>> updated since 2001; so I guess Andre would be the person to handle this?
> 
> Well, no, I'm not going to handle this, because glext.h is _not_ part
> of my OpenGL package. As a "Setup Package Search" reveals:
> 
> usr/include/GL/glext.h is part of libGL-devel-7.2-2
> usr/include/w32api/GL/glext.h is part of w32api/w32api-3.13-1,
> w32api/w32api-3.12-1, w32api/w32api-3.11-1 
> 
> So, it will be up to the maintainers of w32api and/or libGL-devel.
> 
> I understand your confusion.

That's my bad; I was thinking, "I use -I/usr/include/opengl, so it must be the opengl package," but the fact that /usr/include/opengl/GL is a symlink slipped my mind. Somehow I seem to always embarrass myself with little things like this. I blame lack of sleep :)

Thanks for the clarification.
-- 
Bryan Thrall
FlightSafety International
bryan.thrall@flightsafety.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/