This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: rebaseall rebasing dlls into cygwin address range?
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:57:16AM -0400, Edward Lam wrote:
>On Wed, April 20, 2011 21:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> But, for now, just setting the base to something higher:
>> rebaseall -b 0x77000000
>> would solve some of the problems we've seen.
>> I don't know if that stomps on system routines or not, though.
>Just curious, why is this even a problem? If the system libraries happen
>to use some base address that is already taken up, the loader is supposed
>to just choose a different spot.
Maybe you don't understand what rebaseall is used for? It's purpose is to
eliminate collisions with other dlls.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple