This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Problems with 20110801 snapshot

On Aug  3 01:01, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> I am having the following issues with the 20110801 snapshot:
> * Previously I had my DLLs rebased from 0x80000000 up, but now, all
> fork() calls failed until I rebased from 0xffff0000 down.

Yes, that was to be expected.  Sorry about that.  However, since DLLs
will stay in the range below 0x80000000 by default anyway, I was mulling
over a way to utilize the large address area.  And then it occured to me
that it's the ideal playfield for the heap.  See

> * Opening multiple VTE-based terminals (gnome-terminal, Xfce Terminal,
> etc.), or even one after a mintty terminal is already open, produces the
> following message when starting a bash login shell:
> > -bash: cannot set terminal process group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > -bash: no job control in this shell
> In which case, launching a ncurses app (e.g. less or nano) displays on
> the first terminal which didn't have such a warning.  And when closing
> such a terminal, a warning about a process still running in that
> terminal appears even though there is none.

Is that a new one in 20110801?  The change set doesn't look like it
could introduce this.  Can you please look which snapshot introduced
this issue?


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]