This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: STC for libapr1 failure
On Feb 18 13:51, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 2/16/2012 8:04 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 16 07:56, David Rothenberger wrote:
> >> On 2/16/2012 6:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> I read the Linux man page again (http://linux.die.net/man/2/flock)
> >>> and I just hacked the following testcase, based on your flock STC.
> >> That sounds pretty close to what the APR test case is doing, as far as I
> >> understand.
> >>> The testcase is attached. I'm pretty curious what your test is actually
> >>> testing.
> >> I got to work at my real job all last night, so couldn't extract the STC
> >> from the APR test suite. But, here's the test in APR-ese in case you're
> >> interested. I'll remove the APRisms as soon as I can to get you another
> >> test case.
> I've extracted the test case, which is attached.
> I must humbly apologize. The test case was actually using fcntl() for
> file locking, not flock(). I got thrown off by the name of the test:
> "testflock". It seems APR prefers fcntl() for file locking if available.
> The attached test works fine for me on Linux, but fails on Cygwin
> starting with the 20120215 snapshot.
As always, thanks for the testcase. I think I found the problem. It's
hard to explain if you don;t know how the code works, but it boils down
to the fact that my last round of patches back in August were not
actually fixing the problem, but only working around it. I'm hopeful
that I got it right this time. I'm just generating a new snapshot.
Please give it another hit with the APR testsuite.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple