This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20)
On 2/23/2012 3:35 PM, Tassilo Philipp wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Tassilo Philipp wrote:
Doesn't do anything, and believe me, I tried that probably 50 times in
all kinds of combinations...
do not top post please.
? I just hit reply... so I don't know what you mean? Sorry if I did
From where this "etc.so" is coming for ?
I guess ruby. I'll check exactly where it's from...
However, I tried to rebase it as you described below, and still face the
I'll check if I face the BLODA problem as Corinna pointed out.
Thank you for your help, so far!
etc.so is a dll coming from ruby.
Could you try to explain us what exactly are you running/doing
when you catch the error ?
I doubt you are simply running a ruby program.
As "etc.so" belongs to ruby package, rebaseall should have
already rebased "etc.so" to another address than 0x360000
what is the outcome of
rebase -s -i |grep etc.so
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple