This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Heimdal 1.5.2: "unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10"
- From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman at openafs dot org>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:56:00 -0400
- Subject: Re: Heimdal 1.5.2: "unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10"
- References: <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C903ECD at EXMAIL dot hrl dot com> <51C33835 dot 6000207 at openafs dot org> <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C904127 at EXMAIL dot hrl dot com>
On 6/20/2013 6:31 PM, Nogin, Aleksey wrote:
> Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue:
>>> publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password
>>> debug1: Next authentication method: gssapi-with-mic
>>> debug1: Miscellaneous failure (see text) unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
>>>
>>> debug1: Delegating credentials
>>> debug1: Delegating credentials
>>> debug1: Enabling compression at level 6.
>>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (gssapi-with-mic).
>>> Authenticated to XXXhostXXX ([IP.IP.IP.IP]:22).
>>
>> I'm not sure what the issue is here. The authentication succeeded.
>
> The issue that despite the "Delegating credentials" message, credentials are not being delegated.
>
> Aleksey
I still do not understand what does that has to do with the subject of
this message?
The credentials that will be deleted are the credentials of the type
that was accepted by the ssh gssapi-with-mic mechanism. At the
verbosity level that you are using it does not state what that is.
In any case, I am quite sure that if your ssh client states that it has
delegated credentials that it has done so. You need to debug the
server side to determine where the sshd environment or gssapi library
has determined the credentials have been stored. For Kerberos it will
need to be a credential cache. Heimdal defaults to using a non-FILE
based cache but I suspect that Cygwin does not provide a non-FILE based
cache implementation.
Jeffrey Altman
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple