This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: python aborts
- From: Jean-Pierre Flori <jpflori at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: python aborts
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <51F0CF92 dot 60009 at dancol dot org> <51F0E39C dot 1090500 at dancol dot org> <20130725091741 dot GA20682 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51F0FB68 dot 90904 at gmail dot com> <51F103CB dot 20904 at gmail dot com> <20130725151410 dot GB6932 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <51F14DE9 dot 7050702 at gmail dot com> <20130725172007 dot GC6019 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <51F1A3AA dot 5040804 at gmail dot com> <20130726031048 dot GD1954 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130828035943 dot GA6973 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx>
Dear all,
Le Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:59:43 -0400, Christopher Faylor a ÃcritÂ:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:48PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:16:10AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>>On 7/26/2013 01:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>>>> On 7/25/2013 23:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still a (silent) gcc maintainer so I can presumably accept this
>>>>>> patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there outstanding patches that need attention? If so, please
>>>>>> send URLs from the gcc-patches archive here so that I can attend to
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> This libgcc patch, and some minor patches at
>>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00416.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some others from Yaakov's gcc builds, but let's start with
>>>>> smaller patches first.
>>>>
>>>> It will probably be a couple of days before I can give these adequate
>>>> attention.
>>>>
>>>> Ok to submit your name as an upstream approver, JonY?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I have not approved any patches for GCC, not sure if I can act as
>>>approver. Kai usually approves and commits any mingw* related gcc
>>>patches but he is not in currently.
>>
>>Uh, yeah. AFAIK, you aren't listed as a package approver so it would be
>>very difficult for you to approve anything.
>>
>>Ok, nevermind.
>
> Did this ever get resolved? Did Kai apply the patches?
>
> cgf
Any progress on this very nasty libgcc bug?
I've been struggling with random python aborts in the last past weeks,
pointing more or less to verifyable_object_isvalid with quite unhelpful
backtraces, when I finally found this report and a potential fix at
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00528.html.
See also http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-08/msg00201.html.
The fix seems to do the trick for me though I cannot really rely on any
Cygwin part linked with cyggcc_s.dll unless I recompile it.
Any plan to trigger a complete rebuild of Cygwin packages using a fixed
GCC? :)
Best,
JP
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple