This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
- From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex dot ru>
- To: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>, cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:44:12 +0400
- Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <loom dot 20140227T095414-414 at post dot gmane dot org> <loom dot 20140227T100638-8 at post dot gmane dot org> <20140227094951 dot GD2246 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <loom dot 20140227T134714-188 at post dot gmane dot org> <20140227134632 dot GG2246 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <765945729 dot 20140228031219 at yandex dot ru> <20140228120748 dot GN2246 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <1244251265 dot 20140301020854 at yandex dot ru> <20140303092352 dot GB26619 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <231682974 dot 20140303184701 at yandex dot ru> <20140303150746 dot GE2469 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>> I'd need to test it in domain environment,
And with sane number of groups (less than 20), the results are barely
different between different caching strategies (less than 1%, which could
easily be explained by measurement error), except (again) for the case of
runing `id' under "db_cache: no", which takes approximately twice as long, as
any other way.
If you ask me, the choice is between "db_cahce: yes" and "db_cache: full", and
I don't have solid reason to prefer one over another. Not running with remote
connection to the domain here...
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 04.03.2014, <00:33>
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple