This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: More testing needed: New passwd/group AD/SAM integration
- From: ht at inf dot ed dot ac dot uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 18:29:02 +0100
- Subject: Re: More testing needed: New passwd/group AD/SAM integration
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140513105832 dot GM2436 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <f5biop9x55t dot fsf at troutbeck dot inf dot ed dot ac dot uk> <20140513145247 dot GQ2436 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20140513161626 dot GT2436 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <f5ba9aliqv0 dot fsf at troutbeck dot inf dot ed dot ac dot uk> <20140513164122 dot GU2436 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> On May 13 17:29, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> Any trivial way I can test that I am actually _getting_ identities
>> via the new route?
> Call `id' :)
OK, so that does yield. . .rather different results than it used to.
Poking around with id compared to the the contents of /etc/passwd
(from mkpasswd) and also compared to what my x86 install (not using
snapshot) does, I see one glitch and one difference:
Glitch (also true for x86 1.7.29-2):
id returns effectively immediately for all users and non-users _except_:
> time id Administrators
[x86 1.7.29]> id TrustedInstaller
[x86_64 snapshot]> id TrustedInstaller
id: TrustedInstaller: no such user
That's all I've found, happy to try other tests anyone can suggest.
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: email@example.com
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple