This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: dig utility in bind-utils-9.9.7-1 returns no output
- From: Keith Christian <keith1christian at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:19:26 -0600
- Subject: Re: dig utility in bind-utils-9.9.7-1 returns no output
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFWoy7F6DMy4L8ccwOSztuJfKqPhkVW9TTsL2ZEBjvum-6hYsg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFWoy7HKNuz8_nj9iHamGXzxvcFx-mtOSRPQJqn2OxGOpAmLmg at mail dot gmail dot com> <1923978077 dot 20150414135419 at yandex dot ru> <CAFWoy7HGJSXhvjBraTqrw_XZ+6+JQFhJkrfANNGhz4wrXgQ=JQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <552D7120 dot 9000409 at gmail dot com> <CAFWoy7FuWgcpOsv+fnC_wbrrx8rLJY8KcW86+kBJDzDFEoSuQw at mail dot gmail dot com> <552D8C5E dot 2020208 at winfirst dot com> <CAFWoy7FxE_jDKYLx_SNKayzzHOvr_BQb72WtFEQCXfApax0viQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFWoy7HVZt8cTy5wpry+o4FrFTnJSYET1FEZCWL5Jnp7E7QNEw at mail dot gmail dot com> <552ECFAC dot 7040003 at winfirst dot com>
Thanks Mark, but I tried both of those early in my attempts without
success. Good suggestion, though.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Mark Hansen <meh@winfirst.com> wrote:
> On 4/15/2015 12:02 PM, Keith Christian wrote:
>>
>> cygcheck attachment is too large according to sourceware.
>>
>> What specific parts of cygcheck are needed to help troubleshoot this?
>>
>> Keith
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Keith Christian
>> <keith1christian@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Both /usr/bin/dig and /bin/dig run the same program:
>>>
>>>> cksum /usr/bin/dig /bin/dig
>>>
>>> 680300229 2202141 /usr/bin/dig
>>> 680300229 2202141 /bin/dig
>>>
>>> Attached cygcheck_s_r_v_kvc.txt.
>
>
> I'm sorry - I could be completely off-base here. What I meant was can you
> try running
> '/usr/bin/dig' (providing the full path to the application) rather than by
> just running 'dig'
> just in case there is some other 'dig' on your path (or shell aliases) which
> might be running
> rather than the actual /usr/bin/dig command.
>
> In previous messages, your examples were running 'dig' (without the full
> path) so it wasn't
> clear which dig you were actually getting.
>
> Good luck.
>
>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Mark Hansen<meh@winfirst.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure that you're getting the correct dig executable? Is it
>>>> possible
>>>> that something else in
>>>> your path or alias list is getting hit? Perhaps you can try
>>>> /usr/bin/dig
>>>> just to be sure?
>
>
> --
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple