Updated rwlock-in-C patchkit

[Torvald Riegel]

On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 21:40 +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:23:32PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On 04/11/2014 04:36 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:24 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> Fixed the ChangeLog as requested. Otherwise no changes.
> > >>
> > >> Please consider merging.
> > > 
> > > Based on a quick scan this looks good to me, and I definitely like the
> > > direction.  However, I believe this won't get accepted unless you show
> > > numbers by providing a benchtest for the uncontended case.
> > 
> > Fully agreed.
> > 
> > While I trust that you think it's faster I would like an objective way
> > to measure this on the systems that I care about.
> > 
> Carlos that was already addressed in this thread. See 
> 
> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-03/msg00739.html

I didn't see a submitted microbenchmark in this case, which I believe is
what Carlos is talking about.