[PATCH 4/4] configure: Disable building libcrypt by default
Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh@sourceware.org
Mon Jul 17 15:24:25 GMT 2023
On 2023-07-14 02:21, Sam James wrote:
>
> Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes:
>
>> We mentioned eventual dropping of libcrypt in the 2.28 NEWS. Actually
>> put that plan in motion by first disabling building libcrypt by default.
>> In the near future we need to drop it completely but ISTM that Gentoo
>> still uses it to fix some perl compatibility issues.
>
> Thanks. This is fine for us: we did the migration in two stages in
> Mid-to-late 2021.
>
> You are right that we've got a workaround for some Perl rebuild issues,
> but that should've been fixed on our end in the package manager last
> month, so no problem from us. Thank you for checking!
>>
>> +* libcrypt is no longer built by default, one may use the --enable-crypt
>> + option to build libcrypt. It is recommended that applications port
>> + away from the GNU C Library implementation of libcrypt since it will
>> + likely be removed in a future release.
>
> I feel like we ought to explicitly name libxcrypt as a possible
> provider - I don't really like relying on word of mouth for this.
>
> We don't need to endorse it/recommend it (although what's the
> alternative?), but I think mentioning it is worthwhile.
>
> (ditto for texi change.)
>
Should we put a date on it, i.e. say explicitly that it will be removed
in 2.39?
Thanks,
Sid
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list