Adding SH support to glibc-2.2

[kaz Kojima]

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:
> I still want to ask you: do you really need backward compatibility
> with 2.1?  It would be much cleaner (with smaller binaries etc) to
> declare 2.2 the first version and start from GLIBC_2.2.  But I'm
> leaving the decision to you.

I tend to start with 2.2. Can you please do it so?

Thanks,

	kaz