[RFC] Allow read-only dynamic section
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Thu Mar 23 08:19:00 GMT 2000
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
> - Where should we define DL_RO_L_INFO? [...]
>
> - Where should D_PTR be defined? [...]
Let's move ldsodefs.h into sysdeps/generic, define additional files in
the subdirs (e.g., sysdeps/mips/elf) which need additional definitions
and then use #include <sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h> in these files.
> - Are the choosen names good enough? Do you have besser suggestions?
> I'm considering to use DL_RO_DYN_SECTION instead of DL_RO_L_INFO
Yes, use DL_RO_DYN_SECTION, sounds better.
> - Should I send patches for all dl-machine.h files to use D_PTR?
For consistency and to avoid people slipping in direct uses of d_ptr
values in generic files it might be worthwhile to change everything.
Thanks,
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list