Recent s/390 updates.

[Martin Schwidefsky]

> What do you need __frame_state_for for on s390x?
I though we need it for the transition from gcc 2.95.x to gcc 3.x.

> Is that architecture supported by gcc 2.95.2?
> Even if yes, if this wasn't needed on s390x so far, I don't think it should
> be added.
There has been an internal version 2.95.2 of gcc but that never saw the
light of day. The only version that is used at the moment is 2.95.3.
So basically you are saying that we do NOT need __frame_state_for to get
from gcc 2.95.3 to gcc 3.x, correct ?

blue skies,
   Martin

Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com