[PATCH] Fix nice

Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Fri Mar 1 16:50:00 GMT 2002


Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

|> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
|> 
|> > 2002-02-28  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
|> > 
|> > 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c: New file.
|> > 
|> > --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c.jj	Thu Feb 28 23:12:51 2002
|> > +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c	Thu Feb 28 23:15:06 2002
|> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
|> > +#include <sysdeps/unix/nice.c>
|> 
|> Why do you want to avoid using the nice() syscall?  If the syscall is
|> returning the wrong value this can be fixed.  But using
|> getpriority/setpriority seems not the smartest thing to do.

You have to resort to getpriority anyway to fix nice.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list