[PATCH] Fix nice
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Fri Mar 1 16:50:00 GMT 2002
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:
|> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
|>
|> > 2002-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
|> >
|> > * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c: New file.
|> >
|> > --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c.jj Thu Feb 28 23:12:51 2002
|> > +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c Thu Feb 28 23:15:06 2002
|> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
|> > +#include <sysdeps/unix/nice.c>
|>
|> Why do you want to avoid using the nice() syscall? If the syscall is
|> returning the wrong value this can be fixed. But using
|> getpriority/setpriority seems not the smartest thing to do.
You have to resort to getpriority anyway to fix nice.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list