nanosleep in locarchive

[Ulrich Drepper]

On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 15:10, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Any objection to this change?  (On Hurd we have usleep but not nanosleep.
> This call doesn't need the finer granularity.)

This is true t I'd really like to avoid using any but the POSIX
interfaces.  Are there any problems with implementing nanosleep for
Hurd?  The precision does not have to be nanoseconds.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-hacker/attachments/20020514/c0a413c6/attachment.sig>