[PATCH] Fix binary compatibility of bits/types.h

[Roland McGrath]

> and in 2002-10-23 commit lots of types changed from long to long long
> on 64-bit arches (similarly with ul -> ull and l* -> ll*).

That was intentional on my part, removing gratuitous source differences
between 32- and 64-bit platforms.  But I was only thinking about C, where
the width of the type is the only thing that matters, not C++ where names
matter.

> My scripts were only checking
> {alpha,i386,ia64,mips32,powerpc32,powerpc64,s390,s390x,sparc,sparc64,x86_64 -m32,x86_64 -m64}-linux,
> are there any other 64-bit ports supported in glibc?

Don't think so.

> powerpc64-linux port did not exist at that time, so if we wanted to avoid
> changes to it now, we could copy the current CVS generic/bits/types.h
> to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/bits/types.h, but I think it will
> be better to match other 64-bit arches.

I tend to agree, but the PPC32 and PPC64 port maintainers should say something.

Modulo port maintainers' concerns I think your changes are fine.